Tuesday, August 6, 2013

The Morning Line – Two Good Reads, and a Rant



8/6/2013 11:22 AM

Yesterday got away from me, and I haven’t gotten to the papers this morning. Been playing with my Raspberry Pi and a replacement USB hub. (Don’t worry if that didn’t make sense. It’s the cute product name for a computer I own.) But my nose is no longer seeking revenge on me, and the morning run was good.

Instead of a long rant, let me tip you to two people I’m reading regularly. First, Paul Krugman. Yes, you’re reading his columns in the NYTimes, but are you reading his (mostly) daily blog entries? I have learned more about economics and its real-world effects since I started reading it than from any of the Econ I took in college. Excellent, readable, and provides a door to other opinion sources in economics. Which is only, maybe, the most important policy area in America right now.

The other one to read is local boy made good, Dave Dayen. His is a focused voice of outrage pointed at the financial disaster that is Wall Street. That includes mortgage fraud, bank bail-outs, too-big-to-convict, and the efforts to prevent Elizabeth Warren from being Elizabeth Warren. Great stuff. After a long stint covering the news beat for FireDogLake. com, he’s now writing longer articles for a variety of national magazines and web sites, like The Nation, The New Republic, and Salon.

Dayen’s pieces go into deep, precise, outrageous detail on things like the banking industry’s legislative effort to cover its ass by moving every deed, every mortgage in America (includingyours) into a database the industry would own and control, called MERS.
Go read his stuff.

OK, now my quick rant, running off from Dayen’s pieces on the extension of the MERS, which seems to be the next step towards Amexica.

A few years back, the Supreme Court ruled in  Kelo v. New London that a local government could take private property from one entity and give it to another, claiming that the second one would generate more money from it.

Now, banks have intentionally shredded the legally-required paperwork (called ‘deeds’) that can support their foreclosure efforts, resulting in huge questions of ownership over thousands, perhaps millions of homes in the US.

Soon, the banks and the government will choose who owns what, and that little piece of paper you’re waving, your deed, won’t be worth squat.

I see a trend line towards a major problem that plagues third-world countries, whether in Central and South America or in places like China and India, the problem of establishing property ownership.

I read articles from time to time about how moneyed, connected interests take land away from people who’ve been on it for generations. Other ones about how local wars are caused by the impossibilities of determining which family member is responsible for which inherited part of the family property that great-great-great-great-grandfather was given by the maharajah for service in wars hundreds of years ago. I see news about Brazilian businesses that can’t expand because they can’t prove that the building they built and operated out of for four generations belongs to them, to use as collateral to expand or improve their business.

Why the hell are our Congress and our lending industry working toward this level of ownership confusion? It’s been identified as a major drag on the economies of so many countries in the world. The short-term expediency of retroactively making the crimes of the Banks no longer crimes will result in less, not more, economic growth in this nation…but of course, it means fewer fines for the banks, and less chance that Jamie Dimon will go to jail.

8/6/2013 12:11 PM
8/6/2013 12:17 PM

1 comment: